On September 8, 2020, GeoInvesting invited the Chairman and CEO of Origin Agritech Limited (NASDAQ:SEED), Mr. Gengchen Han, and his new IR manager, Joe Ramelli of Ramelli Asset Management to a live discussion and Q&A. We were pleased to also have a good turnout of near 40 members of our community join in on the call and give them a chance to pose their own questions to Mr. Han and Mr. Ramelli.

Attendees:

  • Gengshen Han, Origin Agritech Limited Chairman & CEO
  • Joe Ramelli, Origin Agritech New IR representative
  • GeoInvesting Co-founder Maj Soueidan
  • 30 to 40 GeoInvesting premium network attendees

Disclosure:

There was no fee paid by Origin Argitech to participate in the live webcast. This was an invitation only event and one in which we have been trying to set up for a while to be able to gain a better understanding of the timeline of SEED’s initiatives, as well as other key aspects of where they are with respect to goals and achievements with respect to GMO in China.


Key Questions and Answer Summaries

What follows are the key questions posed to Origin Agritech Chairman & CEO Gengchen Han during the September 8, 2020 meeting.

Since the recorded audio was a bit muffled and hard to understand at times, we are offering the key takeaways from the conversation. Please pay close attention to this section of the summary where SEED’s new IR rep talks about the company being Jon Carnes’ largest position. This position resides in Carnes’ fund. For those of you who do not know who Carnes is, he was one of the top short sellers who outed several high profile U.S. Listed China based frauds. Jon was featured alongside Muddy Waters and GeoInvesting in the 2018 documentary, The China Hustle, chronicling various short selling activism in the China fraud space, particularly as perpetrated on U.S. investors.

Also, please note that we included part of the transcript and selected audio files in areas of the summary.

Maj Soueidan

Can you talk about the history of the company and your role at the company? How has the company and your role changed over time? 

Chairman Han Summary

  • Origin Agritech was founded in 1997.
  • Chairman Han was born in China and after he graduated from university,he worked for the [International Research Institute] in China, founding Origin Agritech. SEED Has spent the past 20 years focusing on corn seed biotechnology research and has developed a nice biotech pipeline, mainly in corn. 
  • SEED’s research culminated in 2009 when it was the first company to receive a GMO biosafety certificate (for a corn gene trait).
  • But for the last 10 years the domestic commercialization of GMO initiatives were not moving forward in China due to public opposition to GMO, preventing Origin Agritech from “monetizing” its corn biosafety certificate.
  • However, China is at a turning point with respect to GMO.
  • China imports 90% of soybeans from the U.S., Brazil and Argentina and also imports corn from the U.S.
  • That’s why it is important for China to promote technology for domestic production of corn and soybean.
  • Finally, over the last year, the Chinese government has been moving forward with laying the groundwork for the domestic commercialization of GMO, starting with corn and soybean.

Mr. Soueidan

Thank you chairman. Obviously there is some tension between the US and China right now.  I understand that in 2009 when you received the biosafety certificate, China did not go through with GMO at that time because of certain information disseminated by the media, and people were not ready for it. Right now, the environment is a little different, so do you see more support and less obstacles for the case for China to go GMO positive? 4:00

Chairman Han Summary

  • The food crisis environment has changed since 2009
  • In 2009 there was no meaningful food crisis in China and thus no immediate reason for China to go GMO positive. And for the past 20 years, GMO positive  progress in China has been non-existent. However, things have changed today. For example, due to the trade war crisis. Also, the opposition in 2009 to GMO due to safety and public concerns is not as big of an issue today because China has been importing corn and soybean products derived from GMO for 20 years.  In general, Chairman Han feels that consumers and farmers are willing to accept GMO products today more than they were in 2009.

Mr. Soueidan

The past year, the country has taken major strides in corn and soybean GMO.  Starting in December 2019 and June of 2020, the government has started moving forward in the approval process of GMO corn and soybean by issuing safety certificates to a handful of companies for both corn and soybean, putting them in a position to start production once China goes GMO positive. And it seems over the last few years, there have been some illegal GMO activities going on. So that’s a concern also. 

  • Chairman Han confirms this

Mr. Soueidan

Before we get further into GMO, I’d like to understand more about how you intend to generate revenue from this opportunity. There currently isn’t a great understanding of this within the investment community. Are there certain ways in which you can do this? Manufacturing, licensing? 

Chairman Han Summary

  • Origin Agritech can act as a licensee of technology from research firms that still need SEED’s IP and general infrastructure. Origin Agritech can also license its own IP. 
  • The key is that Origin Agritech already has a production, distribution and marketing network in place from its legacy (traditional seed business). This is infrastructure that research firms just don’t have, but will need access to in order to monetize their research. 
  • SEED’s traditional agricultural business lost market share due to illegal GMO activities. 
  • Things are different now, as China is cracking down on illegal agricultural businesses and has a better way of tracking illegal GMO activities.

Mr. Soueidan

4-  So basically, you had a thriving business before, you had the infrastructure, and with the relationships you had before using past infrastructure, you can use the same partnerships with current GMO initiatives?

  • Chairman Han confirms these thoughts 

Mr. Soueidan

So, if you look at the patent and licensing business before GMO, there was a competition issue, where you were losing market share in a very commoditized industry. So, if you look now, at least we’d assume, from our research, that there is less competition in the GMO space now that would give you an advantage. Is that true? Is it possible that the same challenges you saw in your legacy business where you lost market share will persist in the GMO business? 

Chairman Han Summary

  • There are only 2 or 3 companies that have a presence doing GMO research. And Origin Agritech is building relationships with them so we can create products with them.
  • Chairman Han once again stressed that these small research firms don’t have the infrastructure to be able to produce, market and distribute GMO seeds. 
  • He also stresses that SEED’s GMO IP is much easier to protect than their traditional seed IP, which should alleviate competitive pressures.

Mr. Soueidan

What I’d like to understand is that as part of your model now seems to revolve around building relationships and partnerships that deal with distribution, manufacturing, and developing new technology, maybe you can talk about these relationships, what they mean to you, and how you plan to benefit from them moving forward. 

Chairman Han Summary

  • Chairman Han continues to stress that Origin Agritech has a competitive advantage along three lines:
    • Product development, which research firms need access to
    • Relations with distributors (who will need GMO products). 
    • Strong marketing channels. Chairman Han stresses that they have important relationships with distributors who have important relationships with local farmers

Mr. Soueidan

And that will be able to keep your costs low and help you reach profitability faster, because I know you had some issues in the past? 

Chairman Han Summary

  • Chairman Han confirm this
  • He stresses that the margin picture with the company’s new GMO model should be better than it was under the legacy model, on two fronts:
    • The company can basically save on research and development expenses by working with research firms that have already completed research and development and need Origin Agritech to produce GMO products
    • The company plans to save on marketing expenses because it will depend more on the distributors relationships as they promote GMO to local farmers. Under its previous business model, the company primarily leaned on its own resources to carry out marketing activities.

Mr. Soueidan

Joe, anything you’d like to Add?

One thing I wanted to clarify, which I don’t know if you or any other people picked up on, is that Chairman Han said that the hybrid business is actually thwarted by illegal GMO, so there are people that are producing, using illegal GMO seeds. So that’s what really took down the hybrid business. He had a thriving hybrid business, and once the country goes GMO positive, they’re going to make sure that only official, approved gene traits like ours that go through the official process will be allowed to be marketed and then everything else will be squashed, so we’ll be back in a leadership..be in a position again to provide the market with no competition. I wanted to highlight that, I hope it’s helpful. 

Mr. Soueidan

Thanks, and maybe a little later we can back on the revenue.  So when you have these licenses and relationships, what I want to be clear on, what does Origin Agritech own and what do you not own within these relationships? So, when you partner with a research institute, for example, what is Origin bringing to the table? And what do others bring to the table?  

SEED’s IR representative Joe Ramelli addresses this question

I can take a stab at that. I think what we are bringing to the table are things like the distribution network, and also the capabilities and secret sauce on taking that gene trait and creating a trans-genetic crop from it. It’s a very complicated thing as Chairman Han said. It’s not as risky as creating it. It could take years and millions of dollars but definitely to scale the technology on. Is that a fair assessment Chairman Han?

Chairman Han continues to stress their three pronged advantages, while SEED’s new IR representative provides additional color.

Mr. Ramelli adds…

I would say, Maj, a good way to view the business model is that it’s very similar to a pharmaceutical company. Nowadays, very few of the innovations taking place within a big pharmaceutical company…they find interesting drugs that are kind of like smaller biotech companies, when they license them and then market them, bringing them through their distribution and sales force.

So, getting back to your question about whether we own, and what the structure we have with our gene traits partnerships…some of them we own outright and some of them are royalty payments. Our royalty payments are very reasonable. You can think of them as not a big burden, I don’t know if we can give formal guidance…It’s definitely an attractive situation with the ones we owe royalties on.

Mr. Soueidan

So when you do enter into a type of situation where you are actually paying for certain rights to how long do those relationships last? Five years? Ten years? Twenty years? Thirty years? Are there long-term commitments?  

  • Basically, until IP protection lasts. Chairman Han confirms that to be around 20 years 

Mr. Soueidan

That’s great, I think it’s important because I think there is a little bit of a black hole where investors don’t understand how long these relationships last…so these are very strong relationships that last a long time.

  • Chairman Han agrees

Mr. Soueidan

So, when we see, for example, in 2009 when you had received the corn certificate, your name was on the certificate, and now what we are seeing is that some of your partners are getting their names on the certificate, so there is some confusion, what does that mean for Origin? Should we be concerned that your name is not on some of these certificates? 22:00

  • Chairman Han starts, then Maj clarifies his question…

To clarify, in 2009, Origin Agritech received the certificate, the bio-safety certificate. That particular certificate got renewed in 2015, and now we’re waiting for it to get renewed again, but in the meantime some of your research partners are getting certificates. Their names are on them, not yours. How should we view this situation?

Chairman Han pointed out that there is confusion regarding their receipt of their biosafety certificate in 2009. He pointed out that the situation is no different than it is in 2020, pertaining to the biosafety certificates that it’s research partners have received in 2020. 

Just like 2009, the research partners are giving Origin Agritech the right to produce, market and distribute GMO products based on the technology developed by these partners.

Mr. Soueidan

At the LD microcap conference, last week, I think, Joe, you had talked about two catalysts, one was to maybe reestablish the corn certificate if I understand that correctly, and then number two, the JV partner, I think it was BTC something, they are going to help you with the whole GMO relationship, and with the JV partnership being inked, the debt being turned into equity. Is that correct and I was hoping that maybe you could give us some timeline on this? 2020? 2021? 

Chairman Han is hopeful that both of these events will happen sooner rather than later.

Mr. Ramelli Interjects…

I was going to say that the biggest catalyst is obviously going GMO positive and I know we’re kind of seeing kind of a ramp up in activity in the seed approval process, things going through, as well as different statements from the government that indicate that it is coming quite soon. So I just wanted to mention that.

Mr. Soueidan

And I assume that once that happens there would be a pretty big interest from a lot of agriculture companies that operate in China too. We’ve actually seen other stocks go up, Joe?

Mr. Ramelli continues…

Those two that I mentioned are multi-billion dollar companies, both have gone up 100% this year. Multi-billion dollar U.S. market cap. So, it’s definitely a good indication, and people are excited about it, and as I mentioned, this is the only play on GMO positive traits in the United States. So, if you want to play a trend of this big…I would call it kind of a generational investing trend, with countries modernizing and going GMO positive. 

Mr. Soueidan

So now you have this JV partner that’s going to help you commercialize GMO. You have JV partners that are going to help you with manufacturing, you have partners that will help you with research and development. What do you see as some of the most challenging parts of growing this business Chairman Han, moving forward- what could go wrong? 

  • Chairman Han is confident that GMO is coming, but the issue is timing.

Mr. Soueidan

And there’s been some US companies that you’ve been cultivating relationships with for some time – can you talk about that and how real that opportunity becomes once China goes GMO positive? 

Our key takeaways from Chairman Han’s answer to this are:

  • U.S. Companies  can’t set up GMO operations and monetize their own IP in China without a conduit like Origin Agritech.
  • And because Origin Agritech has a presence in the U.S. through its NASDAQ listing, it has a good opportunity to partner with multinational companies.
  • These firms can also partner to use SEED’s IP.

Mr. Soueidan

So if a foreign or US company wants to sell GMO seeds eventually in China, they have to go through you, they have to go through you to do that, establish a Chinese partner to do that?  

  • Chairman Han answers Yes

Mr. Soueidan asks if there are any questions from attendees..

Questions from Ed Gilmore of Little Grapevine

Ed Gilmore

How much of what you do is research and how much commercialization and development?  

Chairman Han

SEED’s main focus is on product development. Even if a gene is discovered by another entity Origin Agritech can take it further to by applying it to product and gene trait development.

Ed Gilmore

Grain prices are rising..if this continues will it make opening of GMO in China faster? 

  • Chairman Han answers Yes

Ed Gilmore

Is the African market important to you? Do you have any entities in Africa that are licensing commercializing your products, or do you intend to?  38:00

Chairman Han

  • China is where SEED’s focus currently lies and that South America and Mexico would be target geographies before South Africa. 

Mr. Ramelli follows up…

  • I think it’s safe to say we are still a small company and know there are huge opportunities, but don’t want to spread our resources too thin. That’s also a big factor in that.

Ed Gilmore

Can your gene traits be licensed to companies that want to do GMO in pork. Can you talk more about the animal opportunity?  

  • Chairman Han and Mr. Ramelli both answer, generally yes, they do that.

A question from Mike Woloski from GeoInvesting

Currently, what are the consequences for farmers using illegal GMO strands? What control will you have on your seeds once they are introduced to the market? How will you prevent the reuse of crop for Origin. 

Chairman Han

  • Chairman Han stresses the advantages that GMO seeds have over being able to track the seeds and that China will be more proactive at taking legal action against illegal GMO activity. 

Mr. Ramelli follows up with additional commentary…

And I think Chairman Han brought up earlier that with the hybrid seed it’s very difficult to prove that somebody’s stealing your seeds or technology, but obviously with GMO there is a fingerprint almost on the seed where you can prove that it’s being stolen. Also, I think there’s some anticipation that once they go GMO positive there will be much more effort placed on enforcing the rules and getting rid of people that aren’t following the rules or don’t have safety approval. I think there will be many protections afforded to us.

Mr. Soueidan

Joe, can you define hybrid seed? Since we are using this terminology here?

Mr. Ramelli

Ya, so basically if you were raising peaches, take 2 different varieties of trees and cross-breed them, you get a certain trait. So in the old days, before GMO, it would take generations to develop different traits, but gene editing has really sped up that process and continues with companies like CRISPR, different technologies.

Mr. Ramelli digresses about two personal stories with respect to how he came to be involved.

…about chatting with a large shareholder who worked in sales at Monsanto and is very excited about Origin Agritech prospects and thing highly of HAB.

Mr. Soueidan
On that note, talk more about his personal story which leads into a great discussion highlighting how one of the most infamous short sellers in the China space, Jon Carnes, is bullish on Origin Agritech.

Mr. Ramelli

Mr. Soueidan

Carnes is one of the smartest if not the smartest investors I know with regards to due diligence. We don’t think investors realize that Carnes is involved in this story….

Mr. Ramelli

Mr. Soueidan

  • Maj interjects about GeoInvesting’s role and history in vetting US Listed China-based companies
  • Talks about how Geo was uncovering fraud at about the same time as Jon Carnes, Muddy Waters, and others, where a lot of the work was done by looking at SAIC filings at the provincial level, documents where we could find financial and corporate structure information, subsidiaries. The Due Diligence validated many of the suspicions we had.
  • We have leaned on SAIC filings to help us confirm aspects of SEED’s disclosures in U.S. filings and press releases.

Mr. Ramelli

Mr. Soueidan

Chairman Han, there was a point in time when you were approached to be acquired by another company back in the day. 

Chairman Han

  • When the time is right we can revisit this, but we are currently focused on growing shareholder value.

Mr. Soueidan

Interjecting..I believe the split adjusted price was about 30 bucks?

Chairman Han

Yes, 5 years ago 

Mr. Soueidan

And it now looks like you are in a better position now than you were 5 years ago…

Chairman Han

Yes 

Mr. Soueidan

And I think your company got to a $300M market cap back in 2009 when you received approval…What kind of revenue potential for the company?  

Chairman Han Summarizes

  • With our conventional seed business we reached revenue of 600RMB
  • GMO should be much much more than  that because of the potential for higher price and less competition.
  • Once China goes GMO positive and Origin Agritech gets approvals, revenue could begin to occur  in a few months since Origin Agritech already has the infrastructure in place. 

Mr. Soueidan

When is China’s growing season?  

Chairman Han

  • Starts in April 

Mr. Soueidan

So, if China was to be ready for the  2021 growing season they need to go GMO positive soon?

Chairman Han

  • Answers Yes

Question from attendee

Are your seeds similar to those used in the U.S. that were planted and harvested only once?  There have been problems with farmers planting seed instead of selling through the market. 

Chairman Han

Our GMO seeds can only be used once

Question from attendee

How is the company marketing GMO products, and specifically Asia and the rest of the world? 

Chairman Han

Origin Agritech plans to use its infrastructure that it has cultivated during its legacy years 

Mr. Soueidan

In this chapter of Origin, do you believe margins will lead to better profitability? In other words, are the margins generally better?  

Chairman Han

Han , yes, because of better pricing and less competition (only 3 comps in China)

Mr. Soueidan

There’s definitely some tensions between the U.S. and China, especially with investor sentiment with investing in US Listed China Based companies right now, even some higher profile companies. Obviously you will continue to run the company as you normally would, build trust…are you trying to develop relationships with Wall Street and analysts to reach a broader audience? 

Chairman Han

Yes, Origin Agritech participated in the September 2020 LD Micro Virtual Conference, now GEO and will continue to communicate more openly with investors 

Mr. Soueidan

Thank you.

 

GeoInvesting Disclaimer

Please be advised that GeoInvesting™ is a research and publishing firm, of general and regular circulation, which falls within the publisher’s exemption to the definition of an “investment advisor” under Section 202(a)(11)(A) – (E) of the Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77d(a)(6) (the “Securities Act”).  GeoInvesting™ is not registered as an investment advisor under the Securities Act or under any state laws.  None of our trading or investing information, including the Content, GeoInvesting™ Email, Executive Casts and/or content or communication (collectively, “Information”) provides individualized trading or investment advice and should not be construed as such. Accordingly, please do not attempt to contact GeoInvesting™, its members, partners, affiliates, employees, consultants and/or hedge funds managed by partners of GeoInvesting™ (collectively, the “GeoInvesting™ Parties”) to request personalized investment advice, which they cannot provide.  The Information does not reflect the views or opinions of any other publication or newsletter.

We publish Information regarding certain stocks, options, futures, bonds, derivatives, commodities, currencies and/or other securities (collectively, “Securities”) that we believe may interest our Users.  The Information is provided for information purposes only, and GeoInvesting™ is not engaged in rendering investment advice or providing investment-related recommendations, nor does GeoInvesting™ solicit the purchase of or sale of, or offer any, Securities featured by and/or through the GeoInvesting™ Offerings and nothing we do and no element of the GeoInvesting™ Offerings should be construed as such.  Without limiting the foregoing, the Information is not intended to be construed as a recommendation to buy, hold or sell any specific Securities, or otherwise invest in any specific Securities. Trading in Securities involves risk and volatility. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

The Information represents an expression of our opinions, which we have based upon generally available information, field research, inferences and deductions through our due diligence and analytical processes.  Due to the fact that opinions and market conditions change over time, opinions made available by and through the GeoInvesting™ Offerings may differ from time-to-time, and varying opinions may also be included in the GeoInvesting™ Offerings simultaneously.   To the best of our ability and belief, all Information is accurate and reliable, and has been obtained from public sources that we believe to be accurate and reliable, and who are not insiders or connected persons of the applicable Securities covered or who may otherwise owe any fiduciary duty or duty of confidentiality to the issuer.  However, such Information is presented on an “as is,” “as available” basis, without warranty of any kind, whether express or implied. GeoInvesting™ makes no representation, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any such Information or with regard to the results to be obtained from its use. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice, and GeoInvesting™ does not undertake to update or supplement any of the Information.

The Information may include, or may be based upon, “Forward-Looking” statements as defined in the Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.  Forward-Looking statements may convey our expectations or forecasts of future events, and you can identify such statements: (a) because they do not strictly relate to historical or current facts; (b) because they use such words such as “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect(s),” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “anticipates” or the negative thereof or other similar terms; or (c) because of language used in discussions, broadcasts or trade ideas that involve risks and uncertainties, in connection with a description of potential earnings or financial performance. There exists a variety of risks/uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from the Forward-Looking statements. We do not assume any obligation to update any Forward-Looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, and such statements are current only as of the date they are made.

Origin Agritech Safe Harbor

This communication contains “forward-looking statements” as defined in the federal securities laws, including Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined in the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements address expected future business and financial performance and financial condition, and contain words like “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “seek,” “will,” “would,” “target,” and similar expressions and variations. Forward-looking statements address matters that are uncertain. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are based on assumptions and expectations which may not be realized. They are based on management’s current expectations, assumptions, estimates and projections about the Company and the industry in which the Company operates but involve a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the company’s control. Some of the important factors that could cause the company’s actual results to differ materially from those discussed in forward-looking statements are: failure to develop and market new products and optimally manage product life cycles; ability to respond to market acceptance, rules, regulations and policies affecting our products; failure to appropriately manage process safety and product stewardship issues; changes in laws and regulations or political conditions; global economic and capital markets conditions, such as inflation, interest and currency exchange rates; business or supply disruptions; natural disasters and weather events and patterns; ability to protect and enforce the company’s intellectual property rights; and separation of underperforming or non-strategic assets or businesses. The company undertakes no duty or obligation to publicly revise or update any forward-looking statements as a result of future developments, or new information or otherwise, should circumstances change, except as otherwise required by securities and other applicable laws. Although the Company believes that the expectations expressed in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it cannot assure you that such expectations will turn out to be correct, and actual results may differ materially from the anticipated results. You are urged to consider these factors carefully in evaluating the forward-looking statements contained herein and are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which are qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.